Poliscope turns complex public stories into visual investigation boards. Explore the people, organisations, claims, events, and evidence—and see what is supported, contested, or still missing.
Every investigation is organised around a governing question that evidence could answer.
Follow the links between people, organisations, events, claims, places, and sources.
Open the cards behind an assessment and distinguish support, contradiction, and uncertainty.
Numbered public revisions show how the investigation develops as new evidence appears.
What evidence indicates that foreign state or transnational ideological networks are amplifying the current unrest in France?
Tests amplification, mobilisation and orchestration separately. The board does not assume that Russia, Muslim Brotherhood-adjacent networks, or another foreign actor caused the unrest.
Maps evidence relevant to alleged Russian war crimes in Ukraine—from attacks on civilians and detention practices to command responsibility—while separating accepted evidence, open questions, and missing proof.
Examines how journalists in Gaza are identified and verified—including professional affiliation, freelance reporting, local documentation, accreditation, and the evidence behind individual cases.
Public cards preserve their source links and provenance. Private files and analyst notes never enter the public snapshot.
A board can show uncertainty, contradictions, and evidence gaps without turning them into settled conclusions.
New evidence creates a new numbered revision. Earlier public revisions remain part of the board history.
Bring a question, organise the evidence visually, and decide when—or whether—the investigation should become public.